MARKHAM
FrameworksFramework · Governance

Decision Rights Ledger

Who decides, who is consulted, who is informed — written down, tested against the last ten decisions.

ReferenceMKM-F-008
Versionv1.1 · Current
First publishedSep 2024
Last revisedJan 2026
Review cycleEvery 10th application
StewardMarkham Institute
01 — The problem

Everyone is consulted; no one decides.

In the latency data, 71% of measured decision delay is caused not by missing information but by missing authority — decisions that have no single owner and therefore route through everyone. Most organisations have a RACI somewhere. Almost none has one that survives contact with its own last ten decisions.

The ledger is a governance document with a test built in. Every recurring decision class gets one accountable owner, a consulted list kept deliberately short, and a forum where the decision happens. Then the ledger is audited against the last ten significant decisions actually made: where reality diverged from the page, either the page or the behaviour is corrected — in writing.

02 — The method
Draft

Decision classes inventoried from minutes and approval trails — the decisions the organisation actually makes, not the ones the org chart implies.

Week 1
Test

The draft ledger is tested against the last ten significant decisions: who really decided, who was really consulted, how long it really took. Divergences are logged.

Week 2
Adopt

The reconciled ledger is signed and wired into the operating cadence: each decision class assigned to its forum, each with a named owner. Re-audited quarterly.

Week 3–4

The ten-decision test is the point of the instrument. A ledger that has not been tested against actual decisions is an aspiration, not a governance document.

03 — Application

Where the model earns its keep

01

Organisations where decision latency is measured and material — the ledger removes the authority gaps the measurement exposes.

02

Post-acquisition seams, where two authority structures must become one before integration decisions queue.

03

Hospital networks, professional firms and other consensus cultures, where consultation has quietly replaced decision.

04 — Evidence

Applied in more than twenty engagements since 2024, most sharply where consensus cultures had priced consultation into every decision:

−54%Decision latency in the hospital-network engagement MKM-E-2025-131 after ledger adoption, verified at month 11.
The authority-versus-information ratio in measured latency (MKM-R-2026-011) — the gap this instrument closes.
05 — Governance & revisions

The Institute stewards the ledger format and revises it after every tenth application review. Changes are versioned; superseded editions remain citable.

v1.1 · Jan 2026Quarterly re-audit made standard after adoption-decay findings in the 2025 applications.
v1.0 · Sep 2024First publication.

Cite as: Markham Institute, “Decision Rights Ledger”, MKM-F-008, v1.1 (2026).